RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03909
INDEX CODE: 128.02
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He receive military pay for July and August 1956.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was never paid for July and August 1956 due to administrative
errors.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his
DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the Unites States Report of
Transfer or Discharge.
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
_
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicants military personnel records are unavailable.
However, according to the DD Form 214 provided by the applicant,
he entered active duty on 15 June 1956 at the age of 17 for a
period of four years. He was progressively promoted to the
grade of airman first class (E-4) with a date of rank of 1 March
1960. On 14 June 1960, he was honorably released from active
duty for expiration of term of service. He served four years on
active duty.
________________________________________________________________
_
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
DFAS-JECC/DE recommends denial of the applicants request. DFAS
states the applicants military pay records are no longer
available; therefore, they have disallowed his claim.
Department of Defense Instruction 1340.21, enclosure 5,
paragraph E 5.7, indicates The claim must prove, by clear and
convincing evidence, on the written record that the United
States is liable to the claimant for the amount claimed. All
relevant evidence to prove the claim should be presented when a
claim is first submitted. In the absence of compelling
circumstances, evidence that is presented at later stages of the
administrative process will not be considered.
DFAS states the applicant does not meet his burden of proof, and
in a situation, such as this, where written records that may
prove or disprove the validity of his claim are unavailable,
their office has no alternative but disallow his claim.
The DFAS evaluation is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 11 January 2008 for review and comment within 30
days. As of this date, this office has received no response.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice. After
reviewing the evidence of record, we are not persuaded that the
applicant has been the victim of an error or injustice. He has
provided no evidence showing that he was not paid in full all
monies due him for the period of July and August 1956. In
addition, we note that because of his excessive delay in filing
a claim for the alleged nonpayment, his military pay records are
no longer available for verification. In the absence of such
evidence, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Accordingly, we
find no compelling basis upon which to grant the relief sought
in this application.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
_
The following members of the Board considered this application
in Executive Session on 20 February 2008, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Panel Chair
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Member
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in connection
with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2007-03909:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Nov 07, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Letter, DFAS-JECC/DE, dated 4 Jan 08.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Jan 08.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03182
DFAS-JECC/DE states the applicant reenlisted on 3 Nov 03, entitling him to the SRB which was established in the amount of $60,000.00. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 28...
In a letter dated 13 August 1981, AFMPC/DOA1 advised the applicant of that fact and what he should do about any monetary claims he might have. If the Board should recommend relief, his DOS would have to be extended through 15 May 1962. In a letter dated 13 August 1981, AFMPC/DOA1 advised the applicant of that fact and what he should do about any monetary claims he might have.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01144
Her complete response is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends the requested relief be denied. The applicant is requesting separation pay due to being discharged for a personality disorder. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC- 2007-01144 in Executive Session on 18 Dec 07, under...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02486
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02486 INDEX CODE: 128.10 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: Feb 09, 2009 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps (AFROTC) debt and recoupment actions be terminated. On 17 Aug 05, he was notified of debt collection actions. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02163
His request was disapproved by the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC). On 30 October 2006, he submitted an application for separation under the provision of Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-3207 (completed required active service), requesting a date of separation (DOS) of 30 November 2006. DFAS-JECC/DE’s complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states the AFPC...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-04029
The recoupment action of his $11,581.56, Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be waived. AFI 36-3205, Applying for the Palace Chase and Palace Front Programs, clearly states the member must repay any unearned portion of an enlistment or reenlistment bonus. The master military pay account (MMPA) shows he separated with a SPD code of KGQ which indicates the bonus is to be recouped unless he separated under Force Shaping.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02073
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02073 INDEX CODE: 110.03 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 Jan 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Extended Active Duty (EAD) date be changed from 25 Oct 05 to 11 Aug 05 to prevent a break in service, restore her promotion line number, and clear a debt for back pay and...
I " AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ' JUL 2 4 1998 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 98-00643 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that he be paid for accrued leave not verified on his DD Form 214. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The applicant claims that he did not take this leave and did not receive payment...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02913
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02913 INDEX CODE: 121.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NO XXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be paid for 33 days of accrued leave. Based on non-availability of records to verify the applicant did or did not receive payment of accrued leave, DFAS recommends denial (see Exhibit C). However, his DD...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00959
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00959 INDEX CODES: 121.02, 128.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be paid for her accrued leave and any pay and allowances to which she was entitled at the time of her discharge. Since these records no longer exist for the time period in question, they are not able to verify whether...